Содержание
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
► remove
The Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 (GT3e) is a processor graphics card that was first seen in the Apple MacBook Pro 13 (Entry, 2019) in mid 2019. It is similar to the Iris Plus Graphics 655 in the 28 Watt CPUs.
The so called GT3e version of the Coffee-Lake GPU still has 48 Execution Units (EUs), which can reach up to 1150 MHz depending on the model. Besides eDRAM cache, the Iris 645 can also access the system memory (2x 64 Bit DDR3L-2133/DDR4-2400) via processor interface.
Performance
The exact performance of the Iris Plus Graphics 645 depends on the CPU model, because maximum clock as well as the size of the L3 cache can differ a bit. The system memory (DDR3/DDR4) will influence the performance as well.
The fastest chips are high-clocked Core i7 models like the Core i7-8557U. Depending on the game, the Iris Plus 655 will probably be on par with a dedicated GeForce 930M or GeForce 940MX and can handle smooth gameplay in modern titles in low up to medium settings.
Features
The reworked video engine now fully supports hardware decoding of H.265/HEVC videos. Contrary to Skylake, however, Kaby Lake can now also decode H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google’s VP9 codec. The video output is possible via DP 1.2/eDP 1.3 (up to 3840 x 2160 @60 Hz), whereas HDMI is also supported in the older 1.4a standard. An HDMI 2.0 output can be added via converter from DisplayPort. The GPU can drive up to three displays simultaneously.
Power Consumption
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
► remove
The Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 (GT3e) is a processor graphics card for Kaby Lake models announced in January 2017. As the successor to the Intel Iris Graphics 540 (Skylake), the Iris Plus Graphics 640 is used for 15-Watt ULV models and is equipped with 64 MB eDRAM cache. There should not be any big changes compared to the Iris Graphics 540.
The so called GT3e version of the Kaby Lake GPU still has 48 Execution Units (EUs), which can reach up to 1050 MHz depending on the model. Besides eDRAM cache, the Iris 640 can also access the system memory (2x 64 Bit DDR3L-1600/LPDDR3-1866/DDR4-2400) via processor interface.
Compared to the Iris Plus 650 from the 28-Watt models, the Iris 640 only has a slightly lower maximum clock as well as the lower TDP, so the utilization of the Turbo Boost potential should be worse.
Performance
The exact performance of the Iris Plus Graphics 640 depends on the CPU model, because maximum clock as well as the size of the L3 cache can differ a bit. The system memory (DDR3/DDR4) will influence the performance as well.
The fastest chips are high-clocked Core i7 models like the Core i7-7660U. Depending on the game, the Iris Plus 640 will probably be similar to the previous model somewhere between a dedicated GeForce 920M and GeForce 940M and is usually limited to low settings in modern games.
Features
The reworked video engine now fully supports hardware decoding of H.265/HEVC videos. Contrary to Skylake, however, Kaby Lake can now also decode H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google’s VP9 codec. The video output is possible via DP 1.2/eDP 1.3 (up to 3840 x 2160 @60 Hz), whereas HDMI is also supported in the older 1.4a standard. An HDMI 2.0 output can be added via converter from DisplayPort. The GPU can drive up to three displays simultaneously.
Power Consumption
Standards[edit]
Graphics API Standard | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vulkan | Direct3D | OpenGL | OpenCL | |||||
Windows | Linux | Windows | Linux | HLSL | Windows | Linux | Windows | Linux |
1.0 | 12 | N/A | 5.1 | 4.4 | 4.5 | 2.1 | 2.0 |
Hardware Accelerated Videoedit
Kaby Lake (Gen9.5) Hardware Accelerated Video Capabilities | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Codec | Encode | Decode | ||||
Profiles | Levels | Max Resolution | Profiles | Levels | Max Resolution | |
MPEG-2 (H.262) | Main | High | 1080p (FHD) | Main | Main, High | 1080p (FHD) |
MPEG-4 AVC (H.264) | High, Main | 5.1 | 2160p (4K) | Main, High, MVC, Stereo | 5.1 | 2160p (4K) |
JPEG/MJPEG | Baseline | — | 16k x 16k | Baseline | Unified | 16k x 16k |
HEVC (H.265) | Main, Main 10 | 5.1 | 2160p (4K) | Main, Main 10 | 5.1 | 2160p (4K) |
VC-1 | ✘ | Advanced, Main, Simple | 3, High, Simple | 3840×3840 | ||
VP8 | Unified | Unified | N/A | Unified | 1080p | |
VP9 | 2160p (4K) | 0, 2 | Unified | 2160p (4K) |
Processors with Iris Plus Graphics 650[edit]
List of Processors with Iris Plus Graphics 650 | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Main processor | IGP | |||||||||||||
Model | Launched | Price | Family | C | T | L3$ | L4$ | TDP | Freq | Turbo | Max Mem | Name | Freq | Turbo |
i3-7167U | 3 January 2017 | $ 304.00€ 273.60 £ 246.24 ¥ 31,412.32 | Core i3 | 2 | 4 | 3 MiB3,072 KiB 3,145,728 B 0.00293 GiB | 64 MiB65,536 KiB 67,108,864 B 0.0625 GiB | 28 W28,000 mW 0.0375 hp 0.028 kW | 2.8 GHz2,800 MHz 2,800,000 kHz | 32 GiB32,768 MiB 33,554,432 KiB 34,359,738,368 B 0.0313 TiB | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | 300 MHz0.3 GHz 300,000 KHz | 1,000 MHz1 GHz 1,000,000 KHz | |
i5-7267U | 3 January 2017 | $ 304.00€ 273.60 £ 246.24 ¥ 31,412.32 | Core i5 | 2 | 4 | 4 MiB4,096 KiB 4,194,304 B 0.00391 GiB | 64 MiB65,536 KiB 67,108,864 B 0.0625 GiB | 28 W28,000 mW 0.0375 hp 0.028 kW | 3.1 GHz3,100 MHz 3,100,000 kHz | 3.5 GHz3,500 MHz 3,500,000 kHz | 32 GiB32,768 MiB 33,554,432 KiB 34,359,738,368 B 0.0313 TiB | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | 300 MHz0.3 GHz 300,000 KHz | 1,050 MHz1.05 GHz 1,050,000 KHz |
i5-7287U | 3 January 2017 | $ 304.00€ 273.60 £ 246.24 ¥ 31,412.32 | Core i5 | 2 | 4 | 4 MiB4,096 KiB 4,194,304 B 0.00391 GiB | 64 MiB65,536 KiB 67,108,864 B 0.0625 GiB | 28 W28,000 mW 0.0375 hp 0.028 kW | 3.3 GHz3,300 MHz 3,300,000 kHz | 3.7 GHz3,700 MHz 3,700,000 kHz | 32 GiB32,768 MiB 33,554,432 KiB 34,359,738,368 B 0.0313 TiB | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | 300 MHz0.3 GHz 300,000 KHz | 1,100 MHz1.1 GHz 1,100,000 KHz |
i7-7567U | 3 January 2017 | $ 415.00€ 373.50 £ 336.15 ¥ 42,881.95 | Core i7 | 2 | 4 | 4 MiB4,096 KiB 4,194,304 B 0.00391 GiB | 64 MiB65,536 KiB 67,108,864 B 0.0625 GiB | 28 W28,000 mW 0.0375 hp 0.028 kW | 3.5 GHz3,500 MHz 3,500,000 kHz | 4 GHz4,000 MHz 4,000,000 kHz | 16 GiB16,384 MiB 16,777,216 KiB 17,179,869,184 B 0.0156 TiB | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | 300 MHz0.3 GHz 300,000 KHz | 1,150 MHz1.15 GHz 1,150,000 KHz |
Count: 4 |
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
► remove
The Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 (GT3e) is a processor graphics card for Kaby Lake models announced in January 2017. As the successor to the Intel Iris Graphics 540 (Skylake), the Iris Plus Graphics 640 is used for 15-Watt ULV models and is equipped with 64 MB eDRAM cache. There should not be any big changes compared to the Iris Graphics 540.
The so called GT3e version of the Kaby Lake GPU still has 48 Execution Units (EUs), which can reach up to 1050 MHz depending on the model. Besides eDRAM cache, the Iris 640 can also access the system memory (2x 64 Bit DDR3L-1600/LPDDR3-1866/DDR4-2400) via processor interface.
Compared to the Iris Plus 650 from the 28-Watt models, the Iris 640 only has a slightly lower maximum clock as well as the lower TDP, so the utilization of the Turbo Boost potential should be worse.
Performance
The exact performance of the Iris Plus Graphics 640 depends on the CPU model, because maximum clock as well as the size of the L3 cache can differ a bit. The system memory (DDR3/DDR4) will influence the performance as well.
The fastest chips are high-clocked Core i7 models like the Core i7-7660U. Depending on the game, the Iris Plus 640 will probably be similar to the previous model somewhere between a dedicated GeForce 920M and GeForce 940M and is usually limited to low settings in modern games.
Features
The reworked video engine now fully supports hardware decoding of H.265/HEVC videos. Contrary to Skylake, however, Kaby Lake can now also decode H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google’s VP9 codec. The video output is possible via DP 1.2/eDP 1.3 (up to 3840 x 2160 @60 Hz), whereas HDMI is also supported in the older 1.4a standard. An HDMI 2.0 output can be added via converter from DisplayPort. The GPU can drive up to three displays simultaneously.
Power Consumption
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
► remove
The Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 (GT3e) is a processor graphics card announced in September 2017. As the successor to the Intel Iris Graphics 650 (Kaby Lake), the Iris Plus Graphics 655 is used for 28-Watt Coffee Lake-U models. The biggest difference is the doubled eDRAM-cache at 128 MB. There should not be any big changes compared to the Iris Graphics 650.
The so called GT3e version of the Kaby Lake GPU still has 48 Execution Units (EUs), which can reach up to 1200 MHz (previously 1100 MHz) depending on the model. Besides eDRAM cache, the Iris 655 can also access the system memory (2x 64 Bit DDR3L-2133/DDR4-2400) via processor interface.
Compared to the Iris Plus 640 from the 15-Watt models, the Iris 655 only has a slightly higher maximum clock as well as almost twice the TDP, which allows a better utilization of the Turbo Boost potential.
Performance
The exact performance of the Iris Plus Graphics 655 depends on the CPU model, because maximum clock as well as the size of the L3 cache can differ a bit. The system memory (DDR3/DDR4) will influence the performance as well.
The fastest chips are high-clocked Core i7 models like the Core i7-8559U. Depending on the game, the Iris Plus 655 will probably be on par with a dedicated GeForce 930M or GeForce 940MX and can handle smooth gameplay in modern titles in low up to medium settings.
Features
The reworked video engine now fully supports hardware decoding of H.265/HEVC videos. Contrary to Skylake, however, Kaby Lake can now also decode H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google’s VP9 codec. The video output is possible via DP 1.2/eDP 1.3 (up to 3840 x 2160 @60 Hz), whereas HDMI is also supported in the older 1.4a standard. An HDMI 2.0 output can be added via converter from DisplayPort. The GPU can drive up to three displays simultaneously.
Power Consumption
Standards[edit]
Graphics API Standard | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vulkan | Direct3D | OpenGL | OpenCL | |||||
Windows | Linux | Windows | Linux | HLSL | Windows | Linux | Windows | Linux |
1.0 | 12 | N/A | 5.1 | 4.4 | 4.5 | 2.1 | 2.0 |
Hardware Accelerated Videoedit
Kaby Lake (Gen9.5) Hardware Accelerated Video Capabilities | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Codec | Encode | Decode | ||||
Profiles | Levels | Max Resolution | Profiles | Levels | Max Resolution | |
MPEG-2 (H.262) | Main | High | 1080p (FHD) | Main | Main, High | 1080p (FHD) |
MPEG-4 AVC (H.264) | High, Main | 5.1 | 2160p (4K) | Main, High, MVC, Stereo | 5.1 | 2160p (4K) |
JPEG/MJPEG | Baseline | — | 16k x 16k | Baseline | Unified | 16k x 16k |
HEVC (H.265) | Main, Main 10 | 5.1 | 2160p (4K) | Main, Main 10 | 5.1 | 2160p (4K) |
VC-1 | ✘ | Advanced, Main, Simple | 3, High, Simple | 3840×3840 | ||
VP8 | Unified | Unified | N/A | Unified | 1080p | |
VP9 | 2160p (4K) | 0, 2 | Unified | 2160p (4K) |
Processors with Iris Plus Graphics 640[edit]
List of Processors with Iris Plus Graphics 640 | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Main processor | IGP | Major Feature Diff | |||||||||||||||
Model | Launched | Price | Family | C | T | L3$ | L4$ | TDP | Freq | Turbo | Max Mem | Name | Freq | Turbo | TXT | TSX | vPro |
i5-7260U | 3 January 2017 | $ 304.00€ 273.60 £ 246.24 ¥ 31,412.32 | Core i5 | 2 | 4 | 4 MiB4,096 KiB 4,194,304 B 0.00391 GiB | 64 MiB65,536 KiB 67,108,864 B 0.0625 GiB | 15 W15,000 mW 0.0201 hp 0.015 kW | 2.2 GHz2,200 MHz 2,200,000 kHz | 3.4 GHz3,400 MHz 3,400,000 kHz | 32 GiB32,768 MiB 33,554,432 KiB 34,359,738,368 B 0.0313 TiB | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | 300 MHz0.3 GHz 300,000 KHz | 950 MHz0.95 GHz 950,000 KHz | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ |
i5-7360U | 3 January 2017 | $ 304.00€ 273.60 £ 246.24 ¥ 31,412.32 | Core i5 | 2 | 4 | 4 MiB4,096 KiB 4,194,304 B 0.00391 GiB | 64 MiB65,536 KiB 67,108,864 B 0.0625 GiB | 15 W15,000 mW 0.0201 hp 0.015 kW | 2.3 GHz2,300 MHz 2,300,000 kHz | 3.6 GHz3,600 MHz 3,600,000 kHz | 32 GiB32,768 MiB 33,554,432 KiB 34,359,738,368 B 0.0313 TiB | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | 300 MHz0.3 GHz 300,000 KHz | 1,000 MHz1 GHz 1,000,000 KHz | |||
i7-7560U | 3 January 2017 | $ 415.00€ 373.50 £ 336.15 ¥ 42,881.95 | Core i7 | 2 | 4 | 4 MiB4,096 KiB 4,194,304 B 0.00391 GiB | 64 MiB65,536 KiB 67,108,864 B 0.0625 GiB | 15 W15,000 mW 0.0201 hp 0.015 kW | 2.4 GHz2,400 MHz 2,400,000 kHz | 3.8 GHz3,800 MHz 3,800,000 kHz | 32 GiB32,768 MiB 33,554,432 KiB 34,359,738,368 B 0.0313 TiB | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | 300 MHz0.3 GHz 300,000 KHz | 1,050 MHz1.05 GHz 1,050,000 KHz | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ |
i7-7660U | 3 January 2017 | $ 415.00€ 373.50 £ 336.15 ¥ 42,881.95 | Core i7 | 2 | 4 | 4 MiB4,096 KiB 4,194,304 B 0.00391 GiB | 64 MiB65,536 KiB 67,108,864 B 0.0625 GiB | 15 W15,000 mW 0.0201 hp 0.015 kW | 2.5 GHz2,500 MHz 2,500,000 kHz | 4 GHz4,000 MHz 4,000,000 kHz | 32 GiB32,768 MiB 33,554,432 KiB 34,359,738,368 B 0.0313 TiB | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | 300 MHz0.3 GHz 300,000 KHz | 1,100 MHz1.1 GHz 1,100,000 KHz | |||
Count: 4 |
Сравнение бенчмарков
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
PassMark — G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark — G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench — OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score |
|
|
Название | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark — G3D Mark | 1300 | 14770 |
PassMark — G2D Mark | 344 | 867 |
Geekbench — OpenCL | 5698 | 52980 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2316 | 11173 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 1513 | 3689 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | 4154 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2316 | 11173 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 1513 | 3689 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 | 4154 |
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score | 720 | 4 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 149.931 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2038.496 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.01 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.578 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 819.683 |
Преимущества
Причины выбрать Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
- Видеокарта новее, разница в датах выпуска 7 month(s)
- Более новый технологический процесс производства видеокарты позволяет её сделать более мощной, но с меньшим энергопотреблением: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- В 12 раз меньше энергопотребление: 15 Watt vs 180 Watt
- Максимальный размер памяти больше в 4 раз(а): 32 GB vs 8 GB
- Производительность в бенчмарке 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score в 180 раз(а) больше: 720 vs 4
Характеристики | |
Дата выпуска | 3 January 2017 vs 27 May 2016 |
Технологический процесс | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
Энергопотребление (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 180 Watt |
Максимальный размер памяти | 32 GB vs 8 GB |
Бенчмарки | |
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score | 720 vs 4 |
Причины выбрать NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
- Частота ядра в 5.4 раз(а) больше: 1607 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Частота ядра в режиме Boost на 58% больше: 1733 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- Количество шейдерных процессоров в 53.3 раз(а) больше: 2560 vs 48
- Производительность в бенчмарке PassMark — G3D Mark в 11.4 раз(а) больше: 14770 vs 1300
- Производительность в бенчмарке PassMark — G2D Mark в 2.5 раз(а) больше: 867 vs 344
- Производительность в бенчмарке Geekbench — OpenCL в 9.3 раз(а) больше: 52980 vs 5698
- Производительность в бенчмарке GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) в 4.8 раз(а) больше: 11173 vs 2316
- Производительность в бенчмарке GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) в 2.4 раз(а) больше: 3689 vs 1513
- Производительность в бенчмарке GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) примерно на 25% больше: 4154 vs 3333
- Производительность в бенчмарке GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) в 4.8 раз(а) больше: 11173 vs 2316
- Производительность в бенчмарке GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) в 2.4 раз(а) больше: 3689 vs 1513
- Производительность в бенчмарке GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) примерно на 25% больше: 4154 vs 3333
Характеристики | |
Частота ядра | 1607 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Частота ядра в режиме Boost | 1733 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Количество шейдерных процессоров | 2560 vs 48 |
Бенчмарки | |
PassMark — G3D Mark | 14770 vs 1300 |
PassMark — G2D Mark | 867 vs 344 |
Geekbench — OpenCL | 52980 vs 5698 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11173 vs 2316 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 3689 vs 1513 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 4154 vs 3333 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11173 vs 2316 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 3689 vs 1513 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 4154 vs 3333 |
С этим читают
- Стали известны цены и характеристики настольных процессоров intel 10-го поколения
- Стоит ли покупать apple macbook air 2017 в 2020 году?
- Geekbench 5
- Жйъйюеулйк жблхмшфеф
- Обзор apple macbook pro 13-дюймов с touch bar (2018)
- Две последних модели ibook g4…
- Где теперь брать графику для mac? apple разругалась с blackmagic
- Хакинтош: разворачиваем macos sierra на intel-pc подробно и понятно
- «где карта, билли?»
- Обзор mac mini 2018